Geotechnical and rock-mechanics engineers
Inspect preliminary calculations, units, assumptions and warnings in one workflow context.
ROCKLYTICS · PRIVATE-BETA ENGINEERING WORKSPACE
Private betaPreliminary rock-mechanics workflows you can inspect, repeat and review.
Rocklytics brings established engineering methods, explicit units, assumptions, warnings and reviewable outputs into one browser workspace for preliminary assessment.
- 01
Linked workflow
Five rock-mass context nodes completed successfully in the approved capture.
- 02
Inspectable status
The workspace keeps each node and its completion state visible.
Published work
Product stage
Rocklytics private beta
THE PROBLEM
Preliminary work scattered across tools loses its trail.
- Calculations spread across ad-hoc spreadsheets
- Unit conversions hidden inside cells
- Assumptions and warnings left undocumented
- Reports reassembled by hand each time
PRODUCT PROOF
See the inputs, units, warnings and outputs together.
Review the inputs, assumptions, warnings and outputs of the workflow you evaluate. Available methods and deliverables are confirmed during beta onboarding; a publication is not validation of the entire product.
Review the methodology- 01
Reviewable synthesis
RQD, GSI, RMR and Q outputs are visible together for review.
- 02
Synthetic evidence
Values shown are a non-client test dataset, not a project recommendation.
WHO IT IS FOR
Different roles, one reviewable trail.
Engineering reviewers and technical leads
Reconstruct the calculation trail without reverse-engineering another spreadsheet.
Researchers and educators
Connect an implemented workflow to its published source and explicit analytical boundary.
Teams evaluating workflow software
Scope one representative process and measure whether reviewability actually improves.
FROM FRAGMENTED TO REVIEWABLE
Keep the engineering trail visible.
Before
Fragmented approach
- Inputs split between spreadsheets and notes
- Unit conversions hidden inside cells
- Warnings and assumptions reconstructed later
- A reviewer must rebuild the calculation trail
After
With Rocklytics
- Inputs and units share one workflow context
- Method checks and warnings remain visible
- Results and intermediate values can be inspected together
- The qualified engineer keeps the final judgement
REPRESENTATIVE WORKFLOWS
Start from a real question.
WF·01
Preliminary tunnel stress check
Kirsch elastic stress and the generalized Hoek–Brown criterion for a circular opening — the published workflow.
Review the published workflowWF·02
Rock-mass classification and support
Work through classification and support-oriented methods with explicit inputs and warnings.
See the Rocklytics workflowWF·03
Slope and excavation screening
Screen preliminary slope and excavation questions with traceable, reviewable outputs.
Review Rocklytics use casesMethod coverage
- Stress
- Strength
- Classification
- Support
- Slope
- Soil
- Field
HOW EVALUATION WORKS
Two ways to evaluate.
For individual engineers
- Apply for beta access
- Fit review by an engineer
- Beta onboarding
For teams and organizations
- Discuss a pilot
- Qualification call
- Scoped pilot proposal
METHOD AND BOUNDARY
Grounded in published methods, honest about limits.
Appropriate for
- Preliminary assessment and screening
- Checking calculations and documenting assumptions
- Preparing reviewable engineering evidence
Not a substitute for
- Site investigation or monitoring
- Project-specific numerical modelling
- Code compliance, independent checking or professional judgment
ROCKTECH NEXUS
The company behind Rocklytics.
RockTech NeXus is an early-stage engineering-software company building transparent tools for preliminary rock mechanics and surface blasting.
About the companymineraX · Closed beta
Surface-blasting workspace — closed beta for selected pilot partners.
Explore mineraXFor individual engineers
Apply for beta access and evaluate a representative workflow.
Apply for beta access