Skip to content

Methods · comparisons · workflows

Technical method library

Find formulas, inputs, units, assumptions, limitations, worked examples and primary references before deciding whether a method fits your question.

8 technical pages

Strength criterion

Hoek–Brown criterion

A transparent introduction to the empirical rock-mass strength criterion, its inputs and the boundary between a preliminary calculation and an engineering design decision.

Read method →

Rock-mass classification

Rock Mass Rating

RMR combines ratings for intact strength, RQD, discontinuity spacing and condition, groundwater, and an orientation adjustment into a rock-mass classification.

Read method →

Rock-mass classification

Q-system

The Q-system characterizes rock-mass quality with six parameters and links Q and excavation dimensions to empirical support guidance.

Read method →

Analytical stress solution

Kirsch tunnel stress

Explore the closed-form elastic boundary stress around an unsupported circular opening under biaxial far-field stress, with the convention and scope shown beside the result.

Read method →

Method selection guide

RMR vs Q vs GSI

A practical comparison of three related but non-interchangeable systems: what each describes, what it needs and what it should not be asked to decide.

Read method →

Review habits worth keeping

Spreadsheet vs traceable workflow

A spreadsheet can calculate correctly yet lose review context. Keep source, unit, assumption, version and warning with every reusable case.

Unit errors in geotechnical calculations

Treat every value as value plus unit. Convert at system boundaries and display the unit used in every result.

How to verify an engineering calculation

Start with closed-form benchmarks, edge cases and independent reference values; validation of intended use is a separate step.

When an analytical method is insufficient

Escalate when idealized geometry, continuum behaviour, elastic response or boundary conditions no longer represent the controlling mechanism.

Documenting assumptions

State the assumption, evidence, expected influence, uncertainty and the condition that would invalidate it.