Skip to content
RockTech NeXus
Rocklytics

ROCKLYTICS · PRIVATE BETA

Private beta

A clearer preliminary geomechanics workspace.

Run established preliminary rock-mechanics methods with structured inputs, explicit units, visible assumptions, warnings and reproducible outputs — in one browser workspace.

Apply for beta accessDiscuss a pilotSign in to Rocklytics
  1. 01

    Linked workflow

    Five rock-mass context nodes completed successfully in the approved capture.

  2. 02

    Inspectable status

    The workspace keeps each node and its completion state visible.

Rock-mass context workflowApproved capture · synthetic data · 13 Sep 2026

WHY IT HELPS

Traceable, reproducible, reviewable.

Traceable

Inputs, units, assumptions, warnings and intermediate values stay visible with the result.

Reproducible

The same structured input can be run again and reviewed without reconstructing hidden spreadsheet logic.

Reviewable

Outputs are structured for a qualified engineer to check, not a black box to trust.

BEFORE AND AFTER

A clearer path from question to review.

Before

Fragmented approach

  • Separate spreadsheets, references and project notes
  • Units and transformations embedded in cells
  • Method warnings easy to lose between handoffs
  • Review requires reconstructing how a result was reached

After

With Rocklytics

  • One structured context for inputs and units
  • Linked methods presented as an inspectable sequence
  • Warnings, statuses and assumptions remain visible
  • A qualified engineer reviews the evidence and decides what follows

ONE TRACEABLE WORKFLOW

From method to reviewable output.

  1. 01

    Set the context

    Choose the preliminary engineering question and a relevant method or linked workflow.

  2. 02

    Enter and check inputs

    Work with explicit units, required fields and method-specific guidance.

  3. 03

    Run linked methods

    Execute the relevant calculation chain while keeping node status and checks visible.

  4. 04

    Review the evidence

    Inspect outputs, intermediate values, assumptions and warnings before deciding the next step.

REPRESENTATIVE USE CASES

Built around real questions.

UC·01

Preliminary tunnel assessment

Check induced stresses and rock-mass strength for a circular opening before detailed modelling.

UC·02

Rock-mass characterisation

Work through classification systems with consistent inputs and documented assumptions.

UC·03

Slope & excavation screening

Screen preliminary slope and excavation questions with traceable, reviewable outputs.

METHOD LIBRARY

Organised by the job, not the maths.

Methods span the categories below. Each states its inputs, units, assumptions and applicable range.

Analytical stress

Kirsch-based stress and tunnel assessment.

Rock strength

Hoek–Brown, Mohr–Coulomb and related strength methods.

Classification

RMR, Q, GSI, RMi, RQD and related systems.

Structural

Joint and discontinuity analysis.

Tunnel & support

Support selection and tunnelling methods.

Slope stability

Kinematic and limit-equilibrium screening.

Foundation & soil

Bearing capacity and soil classification.

Field tools

Practical data conversion and field workflows.

PRODUCT EVIDENCE

See it before you commit.

  1. 01

    Structured inputs

    Method inputs are grouped in one visible workflow context.

  2. 02

    Explicit values

    The approved view uses synthetic values and displays the associated input fields.

Rock-mass inputsApproved capture · synthetic data · 13 Sep 2026
  1. 01

    Reviewable synthesis

    RQD, GSI, RMR and Q outputs are visible together for review.

  2. 02

    Synthetic evidence

    Values shown are a non-client test dataset, not a project recommendation.

Rock-mass result summaryApproved capture · synthetic data · 13 Sep 2026

BETA ACCESS

What access includes — and what it doesn’t.

Includes

  • Access to agreed calculation workflows for evaluation
  • Evaluation of a representative engineering question
  • Method assumptions, warnings and reviewable outputs

We expect

  • Evaluate a representative workflow you actually run
  • Candid feedback on inputs, outputs and gaps
  • Respect for each method’s stated boundaries

Known limits

  • Preliminary assessment only — not a replacement for numerical modelling or site investigation
  • Method applicability depends on ground conditions and engineering judgement
  • Access is invite-based during private beta

GROUNDED IN PUBLISHED METHODS

Honest about scope.

Rocklytics implements established methods; the tunnel workflow is documented in a peer-reviewed study. That evidence is for its defined scope — not a certification of every module.

Review the methodology

Important scope

Rocklytics supports preliminary assessment and engineering judgement. It does not replace site investigation, qualified review or numerical analysis where those are required.

QUESTIONS

Beta, in plain terms.

Is Rocklytics generally available?
No — it is in private beta. Access is approved per applicant rather than open registration.
Do results replace engineering review?
No. Rocklytics supports preliminary assessment; a qualified engineer decides whether a method is appropriate.
What does beta access cost?
Access and commercial terms are discussed during evaluation — see pricing & access.
Can I evaluate with my team?
Yes — team and organisational evaluation is available through a pilot.

For individual engineers

Apply for beta access and evaluate a representative workflow.

Apply for beta access

For teams and organizations

Discuss a scoped pilot on a representative workflow.

Discuss a pilot